His interest being that of the moralist rather than the historian, Todorov's The Conquest of America says in many ways more about the present day than it does about the issues dealt with in the book. Talking about the discovery self makes of the other , of the colonial view of difference as lack or absence , of the Foucauldian power-knowledge matrix that often accompanies colonial rule, and of the assimilationism vs. inferiority debate , Todorov's analysis of the first colonial encounter could not be more relevant for twentieth-century colonial history and beyond. For Todorov, what took place in America after 1492 was not merely the invasion and progressive subjugation of one group of peoples by another, but an encounter between two ways of interpreting the world, between two systems of signs. In his history of cross-cultural communication, Todorov narrates how the Spaniards defeated the Indians 'by means of signs,' being in a higher plane of human communication...